Sunday, January 09, 2011

I don’t usually read the columns at because, honestly, I find them kind of dull. But comments on other blogs drew my attention to comics writer Jason Aaron’s response to a recent interview with acclaimed creator Alan Moore. In it, Moore explains some of the more recent ways in which DC Comics has approached him about the rights to Watchmen, and the possibility of new comics about those characters by other creators. As part of the discussion, Moore says:

When Dave Gibbons phoned me up, he assured me that these prequels and sequels would be handled by ‘the industry’s top-flight talents’. Now, I don’t think that the contemporary industry actually has a ‘top-flight’ of talent. I don’t think it’s even got a middle-flight or a bottom-flight of talent. I mean, like I say, there may be people out there who would still be eager to have their name attached to WATCHMEN even if it was in terms of “Yes, these are the people who murdered WATCHMEN”. I don’t want to see that happen.

That’s just part of the discussion, and I recommend reading the whole interview to see it in context. I’m not entirely sure Jason Aaron has done that, because he has written a response. In it, he writes:

But I'll always remember 2010 for another reason.
It's the year I finally stopped giving a shit about Alan Moore.

He goes on to say:

Apparently it's my fault, as a modern-day comic creator, that poor Alan Moore continues to be so bedeviled by Marvel and DC. If I just didn't suck so bad, along with all my peers, then comic book companies wouldn't have to keep making Moore so miserable. To that I say...
Go fuck yourself, Alan Moore.
And also, goodbye.

Again, I recommend reading the whole thing, because I don’t want his comments to be taken out of context any more than he seems to have misread Moore’s comments.

For one thing, Moore isn’t singling out anyone, so to take the comments so personally is just silly. It reads like sour grapes. He doesn’t even blame other creators for his issues with the industry, except maybe Dave Gibbons for allowing himself to be used to send Moore messages from DC.

For another, if one reads the whole interview, it’s clear that Moore’s point is that top-flight talent shouldn’t be spending their time cannibalizing Moore’s work, they should be creating their own. This isn’t subtext; Moore says it right here:

At the end of the day, if they haven’t got any properties that are valuable enough, but they have got these ‘top-flight industry creators’ that are ready to produce these prequels and sequels to WATCHMEN, well this is probably a radical idea, but could they not get one of the ‘top-flight industry creators’ to come up with an idea of their own? Why are DC Comics trying to exploit a comic book that I wrote 25 years ago if they have got anything? Sure they ought to have had an equivalent idea since? I could ask about why Marvel Comics are churning out or planning to bring out my ancient MARVELMAN stories, which are even older, if they had a viable idea of their own in the quarter-century since I wrote those works.

And I agree with him. I mean, there are characters I grew up with whose adventures I want to see continue. (*Cough*DoctorWho*Cough*). But those are characters who were designed to be more important than their creators. When there’s a work that was designed to be self-contained by its creators (Watchmen, Sandman, Aaron’s own Scalped and Other Side), I don’t want to see them continued against the wishes of those creators by anyone else. And I can’t imagine any truly creative individual who would disagree with that.

Now, Jason Aaron has deservedly won acclaim for his own work like Other Side and Scalped. He also—possibly more lucratively—writes Marvel superhero comics like Wolverine and Ghost Rider and Captain America. I haven’t read Other Side, have only recently started reading (and really enjoying) Scalped, and have zero interest in reading his Marvel work. I’m sure it’s just fine, just not characters I’m interested in.

I do believe that he’s probably going to be remembered more for his own work for Vertigo than for his work on Marvel superheroes. (And, as has been pointed out in several places, DC’s Vertigo imprint probably wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for Alan Moore’s work at that company, including Watchmen.) In fact, when folks compile lists of the enduring works of comics literature, I suspect there will be very few Wolverine stories to be found.

And that’s the point that Moore is making: that if the comics industry needs to have people working on characters that are 25 or 30 or more years older to survive, there must not be very many people doing genuinely creative work now. And doing genuinely creative work is pretty much the definition of a top-flight creator. Don’t agree with Alan Moore? Fine, but probably the better way to prove him wrong is to go out and create the next Watchmen, as opposed to working on the same Watchmen.

And, really, if you no longer give a shit about Alan Moore, don’t write an essay about it. You know how much energy I put into writing about things I don’t care about? None at all.

1 comment:

Matt Martinez said...

To be fair, however, Moore is a writer who made his name by taking preexisting characters (Marvelman and Swamp Thing, plus the characters in Watchmen were originally going to be characters from Charlton comics) and putting his own spin on them. While he has created far more original properties than he's reused others, I'm not sure how fair it is for him to be so dismissive of current comics writers.